Skip to main content

CAR T Safety and Management | CAR T Hope

Clinical Trials

Well-characterized and manageable safety profile1-8

Toxicities are managed per established guidance9,10*

  • The safety profile of CAR T therapies is well characterized, with no new unexpected serious adverse events or neurologic toxicities found in long-term follow-ups1,2,11
    • After CAR T therapy, most delayed hematological toxicities improved a few months after treatment12
  • Primary toxicities associated with CAR T therapy include CRS and neurologic toxicities9
    • CRS is considered an “on-target” side effect of CAR T therapy13
    • Often, CRS and neurologic toxicities were low, Grade 1 or 2. However, severe reactions have occurred in some patients receiving CAR T1,2,14
    • Most CRS and neurologic toxicities occur within the first few weeks and are treated at the CAR T treatment center. Patients are monitored for any signs or symptoms for at least 4 weeks after infusion as delayed AEs may occur9,15,16
  • Other common adverse events associated with CAR T include neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and LFT elevations12,17

The management of therapy-related toxicities has evolved with processes and strategies in place to address potential adverse events that may arise.18,19

Safety PROFILE OF CAR T THERAPY IN CLINICAL TRIALS

Any grade LBCL20 FL7,21 ALL2 MM22,23
CRS 78% 49-78% 82% 76%
Neurotoxicity 41% 37-56% 29% 10.5%
Grade ≥3 LBCL1,20 FL7,21 ALL2 MM22
CRS 6-18% 0-6% 26% 11%
Neurotoxicity 16-19% 3-15% 12% 8%
Any grade
CRS Neurotoxicity
LBCL20 78% 41%
FL7,21 49-78% 37-56%
ALL2 82% 29%
MM22,23 76% 10.5%
Grade ≥3
CRS Neurotoxicity
LBCL1,20 6-18% 16-19%
FL7,21 0-6% 3-15%
ALL2 26% 12%
MM22 11% 8%

Real-World Data

Real-world evidence improves our understanding of CAR T

SAFETY PROFILE OF CAR T THERAPY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

Any grade LBCL24-29 ALL30 MM31
CRS 45-93% 55% 82%
Neurotoxicity 15-70% 27% 15%
Grade ≥3 LBCL24-29 ALL30 MM31
CRS 5-10% 16% 4%
Neurotoxicity 1-35% 9% 5%
Any grade
CRS Neurotoxicity
LBCL24-29 45-93% 15-70%
ALL30 55% 27%
MM31 82% 15%
Grade ≥3
CRS Neurotoxicity
LBCL24-29 5-10% 1-35%
ALL30 16% 9%
MM31 4% 5%

AE Management

CAR T treatment centers are well equipped to manage the most common AEs: CRS and neurotoxicity9

CRS AND NEUROTOXICITY: GENERAL ONSET AND DURATION10,32,33‡

CRS and neurotoxicity: General onset and duration  Days post CAR T-cell infusion. CRS median onset day 2-3, Neurotoxicity median onset day 5-6, CRS median duration is 7-8 days, Neurotoxicity median duration is 5-11 days, Delayed neurotoxicity can occur at 3-4 weeks or later

Presentation and duration may vary based on the individual patient and product.

Day 1-334 Within Week 137
CRS High fever is a common first sign and typically occurs before other more serious side effects19,34 Median time to onset is 2 to 3 days and rarely later than 14 days after treatment35,36 CRS usually occurs within the first week. Severe CRS can manifest as early as 1 day after infusion35,37,38
Common signs and symptoms include: Fever, tachycardia, hypotension, depressed cardiac function, dyspnea, and hypoxia. Additional constitutional symptoms may include fatigue, headache, and myalgia.19,36,37
Week 119 Week 3-433
Neurotoxicity Can occur concurrently with high fever and other CRS symptoms, but can also occur after CRS19,33,37 Potentially more severe symptoms can occur after CRS symptoms subside, usually more than 5 days after CAR T treatment19,33 In ~10% of patients, delayed neurotoxicity can arise 3 to 4 weeks after treatment or later33
Some of the earliest manifestations include: Tremors, dysgraphia, impaired attention, apraxia, and mild lethargy. Bradycardia, hypertension and respiratory depression, and coma can also occur.36
CRS
Day 1-334 High fever is a common first sign and typically occurs before other more serious side effects19,34
Median time to onset is 2 to 3 days and rarely later than 14 days after treatment35,36
Within Week 137 CRS usually occurs within the first week. Severe CRS can manifest as early as 1 day after infusion35,37,38
Common signs and symptoms include: Fever, tachycardia, hypotension, depressed cardiac function, dyspnea, and hypoxia. Additional constitutional symptoms may include fatigue, headache, and myalgia.19,36,37
Neurotoxicity
Week 119 Can occur concurrently with high fever and other CRS symptoms, but can also occur after CRS19,33,37
Potentially more severe symptoms can occur after CRS symptoms subside, usually more than 5 days after CAR T treatment19,33
Week 3-437 In ~10% of patients, delayed neurotoxicity can arise 3 to 4 weeks after treatment or later33
Some of the earliest manifestations include: Tremors, dysgraphia, impaired attention, apraxia, and mild lethargy. Bradycardia, hypertension and respiratory depression, and coma can also occur.36

Incidence, onset, and duration of CRS and neurotoxicity vary among individual patients and can be longer than what is listed.

Monitor for late effects of CAR T therapy

Once patients have completed CAR T therapy and are discharged from the treatment center, they return to their primary oncologist for care. Patients will enter into an observation phase that involves long-term follow-up to monitor for toxicities.9

Potential late effects Considerations for management§
Cytopenia32,39(ie, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia)
  • Until blood counts normalize, consider obtaining a CBC with differential at least every 30 days after CAR T infusion
  • In some cases, growth factor support and corticosteroids may be used
Hypogamma-globulinemia32
  • Until IgG levels reach >400 mg/dL, consider obtaining monthly levels, starting 30 days after CAR T infusion
  • Treatment with immunoglobulin replacement may be necessary to restore and maintain IgG levels
B-cell aplasia39,40
  • Consider monitoring for low B-cell counts and immunoglobulin levels monthly following CAR T infusion, as these are signs of B-cell aplasia
  • To help prevent infections, the main complications of B-cell aplasia, IVIG therapy may be needed
  • Flu and COVID vaccines are recommended, as well as antiviral and PJP prophylaxis per institutional standards
  • Antifungals should also be considered for high-risk patients, including those receiving corticosteroids for CRS or neurotoxicity
Infections32,39
  • Consider obtaining and/or conducting:
    • Medical history
    • Physical exam
    • CBC
    • Bacterial cultures and evaluate for other infections (fungal and viral)
  • Treatment should be given according to the infectious source
  • Supportive care, empiric antibiotics, antifungal agents, as well as antiviral and PJP prophylaxis may be considered as needed for appropriate patients
Neurologic events32,39
  • Consider evaluating for neuropsychiatric dysfunction in patients exhibiting signs or symptoms, starting 30 days after CAR T infusion
  • Supportive care, specific adverse event management, and routine monitoring with laboratory tests may be considered for appropriate patients as needed
Secondary malignancies32
  • There have been rare reports of secondary malignancies after CAR T therapy
  • Cancer surveillance with periodic monitoring of blood counts may be appropriate for certain patients based on age or sex
Potential late effects

Cytopenia32,39 (ie, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia)

Considerations for management§

  • Until blood counts normalize, consider obtaining a CBC with differential at least every 30 days after CAR T infusion
  • In some cases, growth factor support and corticosteroids may be used

Hypogamma-globulinemia32

Considerations for management§

  • Until IgG levels reach >400 mg/dL, consider obtaining monthly levels, starting 30 days after CAR T infusion
  • Treatment with immunoglobulin replacement may be necessary to restore and maintain IgG levels

B-cell aplasia39,40

Considerations for management§

  • Consider monitoring for low B-cell counts and immunoglobulin levels monthly following CAR T infusion, as these are signs of B-cell aplasia
  • To help prevent infections, the main complications of B-cell aplasia, IVIG therapy may be needed
  • Flu and COVID vaccines are recommended, as well as antiviral and PJP prophylaxis per institutional standards
  • Antifungals should also be considered for high-risk patients, including those receiving corticosteroids for CRS or neurotoxicity

Infections32,39

Considerations for management§

  • Consider obtaining and/or conducting:
    • Medical history
    • Physical exam
    • CBC
    • Bacterial cultures and evaluate for other infections (fungal and viral)
  • Treatment should be given according to the infectious source
  • Supportive care, empiric antibiotics, antifungal agents, as well as antiviral and PJP prophylaxis may be considered as needed for appropriate patients

Neurologic events32,39

Considerations for management§

  • Consider evaluating for neuropsychiatric dysfunction in patients exhibiting signs or symptoms, starting 30 days after CAR T infusion
  • Supportive care, specific adverse event management, and routine monitoring with laboratory tests may be considered for appropriate patients as needed

Secondary malignancies32

Considerations for management§

  • There have been rare reports of secondary malignancies after CAR T therapy
  • Cancer surveillance with periodic monitoring of blood counts may be appropriate for certain patients based on age or sex
treatment center
Looking for a treatment center?
Timing matters. Find the closest treatment center to refer your patients today.

*AE management may differ based on institution-specific guidance.

Single numbers were taken from meta-analyses.

§Guidance is based on current state of evidence, expert opinion, and guideline recommendations. Institutional standards and practice may vary.32,39

AE=adverse event; ALL=acute lymphoblastic leukemia; CAR=chimeric antigen receptor; CAR T=chimeric antigen receptor T cell; CBC=complete blood count; COVID=coronavirus disease; CRS=cytokine release syndrome; FL=follicular lymphoma; IgG=immunoglobulin G; IVIG=intravenous immunoglobulin; LBCL=large B-cell lymphoma; LFT=liver function test; MM=multiple myeloma; PJP=Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia.

References

1. Al-Mansour M, Al-Foheidi M, Ibrahim E. Efficacy and safety of second-generation CAR T cell therapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a meta-analysis. Mol Clin Oncol. 2020;13(4):33. 2. Anagnostou T, Riaz IB, Hashmi SK, Murad MH, Kenderian SS. Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in acute lymphocytic leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Haematol. 2020;7(11):e816-e826. 3. Kamdar M, Solomon SR, Arnason J, et al; TRANSFORM investigators. Lisocabtagene maraleucel versus standard of care with salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation as second-line treatment in patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (TRANSFORM): results from an interim analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2022;399(10343):2294-2308. 4. Sehgal A, Hoda D, Riedell PA, et al. Lisocabtagene maraleucel as second-line therapy in adults with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma who were not intended for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (PILOT): an open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23(8):1066-1077. 5. Abramson JS, Palomba ML, Gordon LI, et al. Lisocabtagene maraleucel for patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas (TRANSCEND NHL 001): a multicentre seamless design study. Lancet. 2020;396(10254):839-852. 6. Schuster SJ, Bishop MR, Tam CS, et al. Tisagenlecleucel in adult relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(1):45-56. 7. Fowler NH, Dickinson M, Dreyling M, et al. Tisagenlecleucel in adult relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma: the phase 2 ELARA trial. Nat Med. 2022;28(2):325-332. 8. Berdeja JG, Madduri D, Usmani SZ, et al. Ciltacabtagene autoleucel, a B-cell maturation antigen-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (CARTITUDE-1): a phase 1b/2 open-label study. Lancet. 2021;398(10297):314-324. 9. Beaupierre A, Kahle N, Lundberg R, Patterson A. Educating multidisciplinary care teams, patients, and caregivers on CAR T-cell therapy. J Adv Pract Oncol. 2019;10(suppl 3):29-40. 10. Referenced with permission from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for Management of Immunotherapy-Related Toxicities V.1.2023. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2023. All rights reserved. Accessed March 29, 2023. To view the most recent and complete version of the guideline, go online to NCCN.org. 11. Neelapu S, Chavez J, Sehgal A, et al. 3-year follow-up analysis of ZUMA-5: a phase 2 study of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL). Presented at: 64th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition; December 10-13, 2022; New Orleans, LA. Abstract 4660. 12. Jain T, Knezevic A, Pennisi M, et al. Hematopoietic recovery in patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for hematologic malignancies. Blood Adv. 2020;4(15):3776-3787. 13. June CH, Sadelain M. Chimeric antigen receptor therapy. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(1):64-73. 14. Lei W, Xie M, Jiang Q, et al. Treatment-related adverse events of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) in clinical trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(15):3912. 15. Berdeja JG. Practical aspects of building a new immunotherapy program: the future of cell therapy. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2020;2020(1):579-584. 16. Geethakumari PR, Ramasamy DP, Dholaria B, Berdeja J, Kansagra A. Balancing quality, cost, and access during delivery of newer cellular and immunotherapy treatments. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2021;16(4):345-356. 17. Luo W, Li C, Zhang Y, et al. Adverse effects in hematologic malignancies treated with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2022;22(1):98. 18. Kamal-Bahl S, Puckett JT, Bagchi I, Miller-Sonet E, Huntington SF. Barriers and solutions to improve access for chimeric antigen receptor therapies. Immunotherapy. 2022;14(9):741-753. 19. Hay KA. Cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity after CD19 chimeric antigen receptor-modified (CAR-) T cell therapy. Br J Haematol. 2018;183(3):364-374. 20. Ying Z, Song Y, Zhu J. Effectiveness and safety of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor-T cell immunotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:834113. 21. Jacobson CA, Chavez JC, Sehgal AR, et al. Axicabtagene ciloleucel in relapsed or refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (ZUMA-5): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23(1):91-103. 22. Xiang X, He Q, Ou Y, Wang W, Wu Y. Efficacy and safety of CAR-modified T cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:544754. 23. Roex G, Timmers M, Wouters K, et al. Safety and clinical efficacy of BCMA CAR-T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma. J Hematol Oncol. 2020;13(1):164. 24. Iacoboni G, Villacampa G, Martinez-Cibrian N, et al; GETH, GELTAMO Spanish Groups. Real-world evidence of tisagenlecleucel for the treatment of relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma. Cancer Med. 2021;10(10):3214-3223. 25. Jacobson CA, Hunter BD, Redd R, et al. Axicabtagene ciloleucel in the non-trial setting: outcomes and correlates of response, resistance, and toxicity. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(27):3095-3106. 26. Nastoupil LJ, Jain MD, Feng L, et al. Standard-of-care axicabtagene ciloleucel for relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma: results from the US Lymphoma CAR T Consortium. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(27):3119-3128. 27. Landsburg DJ, Frigault MJ, Hu Z-H, et al. Real-world efficacy and safety outcomes for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (aBNHL) treated with commercial tisagenlecleucel: update from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) registry. Presented at: 63rd ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition; December 11-14, 2021; Atlanta, GA. Presentation 429. 28. Jacobson CA, Munoz J, Kanters S, et al. Effectiveness and safety of axicabtagene ciloleucel and tisagenlecleucel for large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) in the real-world setting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Presented at: Transplantation & Cellular Therapy Meetings of ASTCT and CIBMTR; April 23-26, 2022; Salt Lake City, UT. Poster 224. 29. Jacobson CA, Locke FL, Ma L, et al. Real-world evidence of axicabtagene ciloleucel for the treatment of large B cell lymphoma in the United States. Transplant Cell Ther. 2022;28(9):581.e1-581.e8. 30. Pasquini MC, Hu Z-H, Curran K, et al. Real-world evidence of tisagenlecleucel for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood Adv. 2020;4(21):5414-5424. 31. Hansen DK, Sidana S, Peres L, et al. Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): real-world experience. Presented at: 2022 ASCO Annual Meeting; June 3-7, 2022; Chicago, IL. Abstract 8042. 32. Chakraborty R, Hill BT, Majeed A, Majhail NS. Late effects after chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy for lymphoid malignancies. Transplant Cell Ther. 2021;27(3):222-229. 33. Neelapu SS, Tummala S, Kebriaei P, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy — assessment and management of toxicities. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018;15(1):47-62. 34. Davis JA, Gaffney KJ, McGann M, et al. Fever characteristics and impact on safety and efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2022;S2152-2650(22)01689-5. 35. Wang Z, Han W. Biomarkers of cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity related to CAR-T cell therapy. Biomark Res. 2018;6:4.39. 36. Lee DW, Santomasso BD, Locke FL, et al. ASTCT consensus grading for cytokine release syndrome and neurologic toxicity associated with immune effector cells. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019;25(4):625-638. 37. Maus MV, Levine BL. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for the community oncologist. Oncologist. 2016;21(5):608-617. 38. Santomasso B, Bachier C, Westin J, Rezvani K, Shpall EJ. The other side of CAR T-cell therapy: cytokine release syndrome, neurologic toxicity, and financial burden. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2019;39:433-444. 39. Santomasso BD, Nastoupil LJ, Adkins S, et al. Management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(35):3978-3992. 40. Maus MV, Alexander S, Bishop MR, et al. Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immune effector cell-related adverse events. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8(2):e001511.